Not Voting Only Encourages Them

8031416513_c0c7ffbf5f_o.jpg
bobcrowe/Flickr

By Frank Llewellyn

“The greatest threat to public confidence in elections in this case is the prospect of enforcing a purposefully discriminatory law, one that likely imposes an unconstitutional poll tax and risks denying the right to vote to hundreds of thousands of eligible voters.”—Ruth Bader Ginsberg dissenting on allowing the Texas revisions to election law to be enforced for the 2014 election.

The expansion of voting rights over time is one of the recurring themes of U.S. history. The glaring exception is the post-Reconstruction period, in which poll taxes and other measures were consciously used to disenfranchise male freed slaves. We are now in a period when the power of government is again being used to reduce the numbers of certain voters to achieve a different political result.

Voter suppression campaigns are not new. However, until relatively recently, voter suppression was mostly an unsavory aspect of some political campaigns—the semi-secret counter to the other side’s get-out-the-vote operation. Legislative efforts were less frequent in part because of the Voting Rights Act, particularly its pre-clearance provisions.

Since the election of Barack Obama in 2008 and his re-election in 2014, legislative efforts to change the electorate have increased dramatically. The Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act has increased the chances that such laws will escape scrutiny before they are implemented.

Since 2010, 21 states have adopted restrictions on the electorate that will be in place for the 2014 election. In 2011-2012 over 180 restrictive laws were introduced in 41 states. leading to new legislation in 19 states, a pattern that continued in 2013 and 2014. These laws are in place despite, in some cases like Texas, unresolved court challenges.

The new laws—often written or promoted by the right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council—have similar provisions. New voter ID requirements are the most common provision, but reductions in early voting, curbs on voter registration drives, elimination of election-day voter registration laws, and making it harder to restore voting rights to persons with past convictions for crimes have been enacted into law. To see if your state has made into this hall of shame you can visit the Brennan Center for Justice. If you are concerned about making sure you have the correct ID to cast your vote you can check this chart.

In Texas alone, it is estimated that at least 600,000 potential voters could be affected. The impact in the 21 states will surely be felt by millions of potential voters. We already know that mid-term electorates are older, whiter and richer than the electorate in presidential elections. The impact of these new laws falls mostly on poor and minority voters. Their impact will increase the GOP turn-out advantage in the midterm election, and close the gap in presidential election years.

Republicans deny that they have a partisan agenda. Unfortunately for them, their office holders occasionally blurt out the truth. Most recently, Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey and head of the Republican Governors’ Association, stunned voting-rights advocates  by arguing that Republican governors should control “voting mechanisms” in order to help the party win the 2016 presidential election.

I remember a time when the cynical slogan of the day was “Don’t vote, it only encourages them.”  In 2014 in many states the act of voting itself is now an important protest against the status quo.  Now, the not-so-cynical slogan of the day must be: “Not voting only encourages them.”

  Frank Llewellyn is a former National Director of the Democratic Socialists of America. Follow Frank on Twitter @FrankLlewellyn. 

Individually signed posts do not necessarily reflect the views of DSA as an organization or its leadership. Democratic Left blog post submission guidelines can be found here.

 

 

Film Discussion: The Price We Pay

January 30, 2017
· 44 rsvps
The Price We Pay blows the lid off the dirty world of corporate malfeasance — the dark history and dire present-day reality of big-business tax avoidance, tax havens - and what we need to do to stop this.  DSA member Bill Barclay, who has a cameo role in the film, will facilitate the discussion. Watch the film prior to the discussion.

Full film available on Vimeo.

How to Plug in New Members

February 01, 2017
· 12 rsvps

Is your DSA chapter growing quickly and you're trying desperately to find ways to plug new members into your chapter's work? Never fear! On this conference call an experienced DSA organizer will go over the basics of new member outreach and developing a plan for plugging new members into your chapter's work. Most of the call will be devoted to troubleshooting specific issues you're facing, so please brainstorm some issues beforehand that you want to bring up on the call.  8 PM ET; 7 PM CT; 7 PM MT; 7 PM PT.

Film Discussion: Salt of the Earth

February 05, 2017
· 9 rsvps

Join DSA members Shelby Murphy and Deborah Rosenfelt in discussing Salt of the Earth, a captivating film made in 1954 by blacklisted writers and actors about a strike at a New Mexico zinc mine. Well before the resurgence of feminism in the 1960s, these filmmakers were exploring gender inequality and solidarity. Available on Netflix.

Shelby Murphy is a Latina from Texas and former Young Democratic Socialists co-chair. Professor Emerita of Women’s Studies at the University of Maryland, Deborah Rosenfelt researched the making of the film and its aftermath for the reissued screenplay. Here is her blogpost about the film.

 

Film Discussion: Documentaries of People's History in Texas

April 02, 2017
· 3 rsvps

Join DSA members Glenn Scott and Richard Croxdale to discuss videos produced by People’s History in Texas (PHIT), a project that brings to life the stories of ordinary people in significant socio-political movements in Texas. They will discuss The Rag, their newest documentary, which tells the story of an influential underground paper based in Austin, Texas, from 1966-77. Click here to view Part I (the early years as an all-volunteer paper covering the student, anti-Vietnam and Civil Rights movements), Part II (the impact of Women’s Liberation on the paper) and Part III (building community: covering local politics, nukes, co-ops, feminist institutions). But check out their short the video on the Stand-Ins about a group of university students who led a movement to desegregate Austin’s movie theaters in 1961.

Film Discussion: The Free State of Jones

June 11, 2017
· 2 rsvps

Join Victoria Bynum, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History, Texas State University, San Marcos, to discuss The Free State of Jones. STX Entertainment bought the film rights to Bynum's book of the same title. She also served as a consultant and appears in a cameo scene. What was the Free State of Jones? During the Civil War, an armed band of deserters led by Newt Knight, a non-slaveholding white farmer, took to the swamps of southeastern Mississippi and battled against the Confederacy in an uprising popularly known as “The Free State of Jones.” Joining Newt in this rebellion was Rachel, a slave. From their relationship, there developed a controversial mixed-race community that endured long after the Civil War had ended. View the film here for $6 before the discussion.